ListMoto - Turkic Expansion

--- Advertisement ---

Turkic migration
Turkic migration
refers to the expansion and colonization of the Turkic tribes and Turkic languages
Turkic languages
into Central Asia, Eastern Europe and the Middle East, mainly between the 6th and 11th centuries. The region of origin of the Turkic peoples
Turkic peoples
is southern Siberia
unto northern Mongolia
and eastern Siberia
to the north and west of Manchuria. Certainly identified Turkic tribes as the Xiongnu
(Hǜņnu-Huns) were known by the 3rd century BCE and by the 10th century CE most of Central Asia
Central Asia
was already invaded by Turkic tribes. The Seljuq dynasty invaded Anatolia
starting in the 11th century, ultimately resulting in permanent Turkic settlement there. Meanwhile, other Turkic tribes either ultimately formed independent nations, such as Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan
and Kazakhstan
or formed enclaves within other nations, such as Chuvashia. Turkic peoples
Turkic peoples
also survived in their original range, such as the Sakha Republic
Sakha Republic
of Siberia, as well as in other scattered places of the Far East.


1 Ancestral populations

1.1 Records of the Grand Historian 1.2 Equestrian pastoralists of the northeast 1.3 Xiongnu

2 Huns

2.1 Identity of the Huns

3 Göktürks

3.1 Five Hu 3.2 Rouran
and Tie-le 3.3 Tu-jue (Turks)

4 Uyghurs 5 Turkmens 6 See also 7 Notes 8 References 9 External links

Ancestral populations[edit] The earliest documented Turkic peoples
Turkic peoples
appear as nomadic tribes on the plains of the Far East north of the Great Wall of China, which was constructed as a fortified border essentially between Han dynasty
Han dynasty
(206 BCE-220 CE) China (though started earlier) and the Xiongnu. Records of the Grand Historian[edit] The population ancestral to the Turks is thought to have included the Xiongnu
of Mongolia
or along the upper Yenisei
in Siberia
(the area of the contemporary Tuvan language), known from historical sources. The Han chronicle of the Xiongnu, included in the Records of the Grand Historian of the second century BCE, traces a legendary history of them back a thousand years before the Han to a legendary ancestor, Chunwei, a supposed descendant of the Chinese rulers of the Xia dynasty[1] (c. 2070 – c. 1600 BCE). Chunwei lived among the "Mountain Barbarians" Xianyun or Hunzhu. Xianyun and Hunzhu's names may connect them to the Turkic people, who later were said[by whom?] to have been iron-workers and to have kept a national shrine in a mountain cave in Mongolia. Apparently the Xiongnu
comprised a number of tribes and geographic groups, not all of which were probably Turkic (considering the later mixed ethnicity). The Records of the Grand Historian
Records of the Grand Historian
mention the Mianshu, Hunrong and Diyuan west of Long; the Yiqu, Dali, Wiezhi and Quyan north of the Qi and Liang mountains and Jing and Qi Rivers; the Forest Barbarians and Loufan north of Jin and the Eastern Barbarians and Mountain Barbarians north of Yan. Later the treatise mentions others. There were apparently many of the latter. At the end of the Xia, about 1569 BCE by the reckoning of the Records of the Grand Historian, the Chinese founded a city, Bin, among the Rong tribe of barbarians. In 1269 the Rong and the Di forced the relocation of Bin. About 1169 BCE the Quanyishi tribe was attacked by the Zhou Dynasty, which in 1159 forced all the barbarians into "the submissive wastes" north of the Jing and Luo Rivers. In 969 BCE "King Mu attacked the Quanrong and brought back with him four white wolves and four white deer ...." The early Turkic peoples
Turkic peoples
believed that shamans could shape-shift into wolves. In 769 Marquis Shen of the Zhou enlisted the assistance of the Quanrong in rebelling against the emperor You. The barbarians did not then withdraw but took Jiaohuo between the Jing and Wei Rivers and from there went marauding into central China, but were driven out. In 704 the Mountain Barbarians marauded through Yan, and in 660 BC attacked the Zhou emperor Xiang in Luo. He had discarded a barbarian queen. The barbarians put another on the throne. They went on plundering until driven out in 656 BC. Subsequently the Chinese drove out the Di and subordinated all the Xiongnu
(temporarily at least). Around 456 BC the Chinese took Dai from them. The Yiqu tribe tried building fortifications but lost them to the Chinese in this period of their expansion. Here the detail of the narrative increases as it deals with the rise of the Qin Dynasty of 221-206 BCE, which is no doubt mainly historical rather than legendary. The Qin kept the Xiongnu
at bay. Equestrian pastoralists of the northeast[edit] In trying to answer questions regarding the "race" of the proto-Turkic speakers, neither anthropometric nor genetic studies have provided conclusive answers. DNA
analyses find affinities to West Eurasian populations in the west, North East Asian populations in the east, and a mixture of both on a gradient in-between.[2] These genetic circumstances suggest that the major "racial" changes over this vast region occurred at a major earlier time than spread of Turkic languages; the languages may have evolved among populations that were already mixed.[clarification needed]

Grassland in Inner Mongolia

Concerning the cultural genesis of the Huns, the Cambridge Ancient History of China asserts: "Beginning in about the eighth century BC, throughout inner Asia horse-riding pastoral communities appeared, giving origin to warrior societies." These were part of a larger belt of "equestrian pastoral peoples" stretching from the Black Sea
Black Sea
to Mongolia, and known to the Greeks as the Scythians.[3] The Scythians in the west were Iranian, speaking one among very many languages ultimately descended from Proto-Indo-European, whose speakers themselves are also hypothesised to have occupied the Pontic-Caspian Steppe, according to the leading theory of Indo-European origins, the Kurgan model. The communities of the northern belt north of China, a historically Inner Mongolia
region were the Proto-Xiongnu. Xiongnu[edit] Further information: Han– Xiongnu
War Further information: Xiongnu

The Han Dynasty
Han Dynasty
and the Xiongnu

Qin's campaign against the Xiongnu
of 215 BCE kept the Xiongnu
at bay,[4] driving them out of and seizing the Ordos region.[5] Problems re-emerged after the Qin Dynasty. The Xiong-nu
attacked Shanxi
of the Han in 201 BCE. Emperor Gaozu of Han
Emperor Gaozu of Han
bought them off with jade, silk and a Chinese wife for the Shanyu, or leader.[6] Relations with the Xiongnu
continued to be troubled and in 133 BC Emperor Wu of Han proceeded against them with 300,000 men.[7] Eighty-one years and fourteen expeditions later in 52 BC the southern Xiongnu
surrendered and the northern desisted from raiding. The Han Dynasty
Han Dynasty
military expeditions continued near the frontier of China, in the Han–Xiongnu War, and in 89 AD the Xiongnu
state was defeated and soon ended.[8][9] One especially severe round of nomadic rebellion in the early 4th century has led to the certain identification of the Xiongnu
with the Huns. A letter (Letter II) written in the ancient Sogdian language excavated from a Han Dynasty
Han Dynasty
watchtower in 1911 identified the perpetrators of these events as the xwn, "Huns", supporting de Guignes' 1758 identification. The equivalence was not without its critics, notably Otto J. Maenchen-Helfen, who argued that xwn was a general name and could refer to anyone. More recently other evidence was noticed: Zhu Fahu, a monk, translated Sanskrit
Hūṇa in the Tathāgataguhya Sūtra and in the Lalitavistara Sūtra
Lalitavistara Sūtra
as "Xiongnu". Vaissière reconstructs the pronunciation as *Xiwong nuo. Moreover, the Book of Wei states that the king of the Xiongnu
killed the king of Sogdia
and took the country, an event is datable to the time of the Huns, who did exactly that; in short, "... the name of the Huns
is a precise referent and not generic."[10] Huns[edit]

The Hunnic Empire of about AD 450 as seen by European authors. The star marks where the nomadic Huns
chose to encamp, the Hungarian plain, a sort of enclave of steppe country in a mountainous region.

Identity of the Huns[edit] Further information: Huns While their actual identity is still debated, the Huns
have often been considered a Turkic people, and sometimes associated with the Xiongnu. Orosius has the Huns
riding down upon the Ostrogoths
in the year AD 377 totally by surprise, "long shut off by inaccessible mountains"[11] and apparently of hitherto unsuspected existence. Whatever may have been his reasons for making such a statement, he and Goths
might have found ample reference to the Huns
in the classical geographers, such as Pliny and Ptolemy; in fact, some were already in Europe.[12] The mountains were mythical as the Ostrogoths
were located on the Pontic steppe, an easy target for Hunnic cavalry. While in Europe
they incorporated others, such as Goths, Slavs, and Alans. The Huns
were not literate (according to Procopius[13]) and left nothing linguistic with which to identify them except their names,[13] which derive from Germanic, Iranian, Turkic, unknown and a mixture.[14] Some, such as Ultinčur and Alpilčur, are like Turkish names ending in -čor, Pecheneg
names in -tzour and Kirghiz names in -čoro. Names ending in -gur, such as Utigur and Onogur, and -gir, such as Ultingir, are like Turkish names of the same endings. The Huns
called themselves the Acatir (Greek Akatiroi, Latin Acatiri), which Wilhelm Tomaschek
Wilhelm Tomaschek
derived from Agac-ari, "forest men",[15] reminiscent of the "Forest Barbarians" of the Shi-Ji. The Agaj-eri are mentioned in an AD 1245 Turko-Arabian Dictionary. The name Agac-eri occurred in later history in Anatolia
and Khuzistan(e.g. city of Aghajari). Maenchen-Helfen rejects this etymology on the grounds that g is not k and there appears to be no linguistic rule to make the connection.[16] Herodotus, however, mentions the Agathyrsi, whom Latham connects with some early Acatiri in Dacia.[17] Jordanes
places the "most mighty race of the Acatziri, ignorant of agriculture, which lives upon its herds and upon hunting" south of the Aesti
(in part Prussians). A number of sources identify the Bulgars with the Huns.[18] Another branch were the Saviri, or Sabir people. The strongest candidate for a remnant of the speakers of the Hunnic language are the Chuvash, who are on or near the location of the Volga Bulgars. Göktürks[edit] The end of the Huns
as a Eurasian political unity is not known. A token end point for the Huns
of the west, perhaps all the Huns, is the fixation of the head of Dengizich, a son of Attila, on a pole at Constantinople
in 469. He had been defeated in Thrace
in that year by Anagastes, a Gothic general in the service of the Roman Empire.[19] Various peoples continued to call themselves Huns
even though acting autonomously, such as the Sabir people. According to the Cambridge History of Early Inner Asia, the last state to call itself Hunnic was the Caucasian Kingdom of the Huns, visited in 682 by an Albanian bishop.[20] Many of these peoples were Turkic but meanwhile other coalitions leading to explicitly named Turkic empires had been forming on the original range of the Xiong-nu. Their expansion has been conventionally called the "Turkic migration" but in fact the Turkics had already been "migrating" for some centuries. Five Hu[edit] The early-fourth-century saw a rebellion, with sacking of northern Chinese cities, by the Xiong-nu. However, most of the Xiongnu
were later wiped out by the Chinese Ran Wei
Ran Wei
state (350–352) after Ran Min's cull order following the end of the Wei–Jie war, which annihilated three of the "Five Hu" tribes. In that century some of the Xiong-nu
broke away and joined with the Di as the Five Hu, or "Five Barbarian Peoples" (Wu Hu 五胡), as the Chinese called them, for purposes of ruling the north of China.[21] The Five Hu were the Xiong-nu, Jie, Zhi, Chiang people and Xianbei,[22] although different groups of historians and historiographers have their own definitions.[clarification needed] Rouran
and Tie-le[edit] However, the Chinese name "tie-le", corresponding to "Türük", was used much earlier, around the period when the Mongolic tribes Tuoba and Rouran
vied for hegemony over the Mongolian steppes around the 5th and 6th centuries. Tu-jue (Turks)[edit] The term Türk or Türküt, corresponding to the Chinese name tu-jue, was first used as an endonym in the Orkhon inscriptions
Orkhon inscriptions
of the Göktürks
(English: 'Celestial Turks') of Central Asia. The first reference to "Turks" (Tujue) appears in Chinese sources of the 6th century. The earliest evidence of Turkic languages
Turkic languages
as a separate group comes from the Orkhon inscriptions
Orkhon inscriptions
of the early 8th century. The precise date of the initial expansion from the early homeland remains unknown. The first state known as "Turk", giving its name to the many states and peoples afterwards, was that of the Göktürks (gök = 'blue' or 'celestial', however in this context "gok" refers to the direction "east". Therefore, Gokturks are the Eastern Turks) in the 6th century. The head of the Ashina clan led his people from Li-jien (modern Zhelaizhai) to the Rouran
seeking inclusion in their confederacy and protection from China. His tribe comprised famed metal smiths and was granted land near a mountain quarry that looked like a helmet, from which they got their name 突厥. A century later their power had increased such that they conquered the Rouruan and set about establishing a Göktürk Empire (reference required). The Turkic family of languages were spoken by Bulgars, Pechenegs, Cumans, Dingling, Gaoche peoples long before the Göktürk Khanate came into prominence. Many groups speaking 'Turkic' languages never adopted the name "Turk" for their own identity. Among the peoples that came under Göktürk dominance and adopted its political culture and lingua-franca, the name "Turk" wasn't always the preferred identity. In other words, there wasn't a unified movement westward by a culture under one unified ethnic identity, such as that of the Mongol conquest of Eurasia under the Chinggisid
political leadership. Rather, Turkic languages – both peripheral ones like the Bulgar branch and central ones like the Oghuz and Karluk-Chagatay branches – drifted westward by autonomous movements of diverse tribes and migrating traders, soldiers and townspeople, outnumbering and assimilating non-Turkic indigenous peoples along the way, and being partly replaced by other language families that have become prominent in the east, such as Mongolic languages on the Mongolian steppes, Indic languages in India, and Persian in post-Timurid Iran (reference required). Uyghurs[edit] Later Turkic peoples
Turkic peoples
include the Karluks
(mainly 8th century), Uyghurs, Kyrgyz, Oghuz (or Guz, Uz, Ghuzz, etc.) Turks, and Turkmens. As these peoples were founding states in the area between Mongolia
and Transoxiana, they came into contact with Muslims, and most gradually adopted Islam. However, there were also some other groups of Turkic people who belonged to other religions, including Christians, Jews (see Khazars), Buddhists, and Zoroastrians. Turkmens[edit]

Settlements and regions affected during the first wave of Turkish invasions in Asia Minor (1050-1204).

While the Karakhanid state remained in this territory until its conquest by Genghis Khan, the Turkmen group of tribes was formed around the core of westward Oghuz. The name "Turkmen" originally simply meant "I am Turk" in the language of the diverse tribes living between the Karakhanid and Samanid states. Thus, the ethnic consciousness among some, but not all Turkic tribes as "Turkmens" in the Islamic era came long after the fall of the non-Muslim Gokturk (and Eastern and Western) Khanates. The name "Turk" in the Islamic era became an identity that grouped Islamized Turkic tribes in contradistinction to Turkic tribes that were not Muslim (that mostly have been referred to as "Tatar"), such as the Nestorian Naiman (which became a major founding stock for the Muslim Kazakh nation) and Buddhist Tuvans. Thus the ethnonym "Turk" for the diverse Islamized Turkic tribes somehow served the same function as the name "Tajik" did for the diverse Iranian peoples
Iranian peoples
who converted to Islam
and adopted Persian as their lingua-franca. Both names first and foremost labeled Muslimness, and to a lesser extent, common language and ethnic culture. Long after the departure of the Turkmens
from Transoxonia towards the Karakum and Caucasus, consciousness associated with the name "Turk" still remained, as Chagatay and Timurid period Central Asia was called "Turkestan" and the Chagatay language called "Turki", even though the people only referred to themselves as "Mughals", "Sarts", "Taranchis" and "Tajiks". This name "Turk", was not commonly used by most groups of the Kypchak branch, such as the Kazakhs, although they are closely related to the Oghuz (Turkmens) and Karluks (Karakhanids, Sarts, Uyghurs). Neither did Bulgars
(Kazan Tatars, Chuvash) and non-Muslim Turkic groups (Tuvans, Yakuts, Yugurs) come close to adopting the ethnonym "Turk" in its Islamic Era sense. Among the Karakhanid period Turkmen tribes rose the Atabeg Seljuq of the Kinik tribe, whose dynasty grew into a great Islamic empire stretching from India to Anatolia. Turkic soldiers in the army of the Abbasid
caliphs emerged as the de facto rulers of much of the Muslim Middle East
Middle East
(apart from Syria
and North Africa) from the 13th century. The Oghuz and other tribes captured and dominated various countries under the leadership of the Seljuk dynasty, and eventually captured the territories of the Abbasid dynasty and the Byzantine Empire. Meanwhile, the Kyrgyz and Uyghurs
were struggling with one another and with the Chinese Empire. The Kyrgyz people
Kyrgyz people
ultimately settled in the region now referred to as Kyrgyzstan. The Batu hordes conquered the Volga Bulgars
in what is today Tatarstan
and Kypchaks
in what is now Southern Russia, following the westward sweep of the Mongols
in the 13th century. Other Bulgars
settled in Europe
in the 7-8th centuries, but were assimilated by the Slavs, giving the name to the Bulgarians and the Slavic Bulgarian language. It was under Seljuq suzerainty that numerous Turkmen tribes, especially those that came through the Caucasus
via Azerbaijan, acquired fiefdoms (beyliks) in newly conquered areas of Anatolia, Iraq and even the Levant. Thus, the ancestors of the founding stock of the modern Turkish nation were most closely related to the Oghuz Turkmen groups that settled in the Caucasus
and later became the Azerbaijani nation. By early modern times, the name "Turkestan" has several definitions:

land of sedentary Turkic-speaking townspeople that have been subjects of the Central Asian Chagatayids, i.e. Sarts, Central Asian Mughals, Central Asian Timurids, Uyghurs
of Chinese Turkestan
Chinese Turkestan
and the later invading Tatars
that came to be known as Uzbeks; This area roughly coincides with "Khorasan" in the widest sense, plus Tarim Basin
Tarim Basin
which was known as Chinese Turkestan. It is ethnically diverse, and includes homelands of non- Turkic peoples
Turkic peoples
like the Tajiks, Pashtuns, Hazaras, Dungans, Dzungars. Turkic peoples
Turkic peoples
of the Kypchak branch, i.e. Kazakhs and Kyrgyz, are not normally considered "Turkestanis" but are also populous (as pastoralists) in many parts of Turkestan. a specific district governed by a 17th-century Kazakh Khan, in modern-day Kazakhstan, which were more sedentary than other Kazakh areas, and were populated by towns-dwelling Sarts

See also[edit]

Migration Period Nomadic empire Turkic tribal confederations History of Central Asia Hephthalites Xionites Islamicisation and Turkicisation of Xinjiang. Tatar invasions Genetic history of the Turkish people Haplogroup N-M231 Khazar theory Sun Language Theory Mongol invasions and conquests Ottoman Empire


^ Sima, Qian; Burton Watson (1993). Records of the Grand Historian. Columbia University Press. pp. 129–162. ISBN 0-231-08166-9.  ^ Khusnutdinova, E.; et al. (2002). "POSTER NO: 548: Mitochondrial DNA variety in Turkic and Uralic-speaking people". Shanghai: HGM2002.  ^ Di Cosmo, Nicola (1999). "The Northern Frontier in Pre-Imperial China". In Loewe, Michael; Shaughnessy, Edward L. The Cambridge History of Ancient China: From the Origins of Civilization to 221 B.C. Cambridge University Press. p. 886. ISBN 0-521-47030-7.  ^ Wood, Frances (2002). The Silk
Road: Two Thousand years in the Heart of Asia. University of California Press. p. 50. ISBN 0-520-23786-2.  ^ Ebrey, Patricia Buckley; Walthall, Anne; Palais, James B. (2009). East Asia: A cultural, social, and political history (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin. p. 40. ISBN 978-0-547-00534-8.  ^ Morton, W. Scott; Charlton M. Lewis (2004). China: Its History and Culture: Fourth Edition. McGraw-Hill Professional. p. 52. ISBN 0-07-141279-4.  ^ Morton (2004), page 55. ^ Book of Later Han, vols. 04, 19, 23, 88, 89, 90. ^ Zizhi Tongjian, vol. 47. ^ Vaissière, Etienne de la (2004). "The Rise of Sogdian Merchants and the Role of the Huns: The Historical Importance of the Sodgian Ancient Letters". In Whitfield, Susan. The Silk
Road: Trade, travel, War and Faith. Chicago: Serindia Publications Inc. pp. 22–23. ISBN 1-932476-12-1.  first2= missing last2= in Editors list (help) ^ Orosius. "Historiarum Adversum Paganos Libri VII". Book VII Section 33.10. The Latin Library.  ^ Maenchen-Helfen, Otto J. (1973). Max Knight, ed. The World of the Huns. The University of California Press. pp. 444–455.  ^ a b Maenchen-Helfen (1973) page 376. ^ Maenchen-Helfen (1973) pages 441–442. ^ Maenchen-Helfen (1973) pages 427–428. ^ Maenchen-Helfen (1973) page 437. ^ Latham, Robert Gordon (2003 from 1863). The Nationalities of Europe: Volume 2. Adamant Media Corporation. p. 391. ISBN 1-4021-8765-3.  Check date values in: date= (help) ^ Maenchen-Helfen (1973) page 432. ^ Maenchen-Helfen (1973), Page 168. ^ Sinor, Denis (1990). The Cambridge History of Early Inner Asia. Cambridge University Press. p. 201. ISBN 0-521-24304-1.  ^ Holcombe, Charles (2001). The Genesis of East Asia, 221 B.C.-A.D. 907. University of Hawaii Press. p. 114. ISBN 0-8248-2465-2.  ^ Saso, Michael R. (1991). Buddhist Studies in the People's Republic of China, 1990–1991. University of Hawaii Press. p. 141. ISBN 0-8248-1363-4. 


Findley, Carter Vaughnm, The Turks in World History, Oxford University Press: Oxford (2005). Holster, Charles Warren, The Turks of Central Asia
Central Asia
Praeger: Westport, Connecticut (1993).

External links[edit]

The Turkic Expansion

v t e

Turkic topics


Afshar Altay Äynu Azerbaijani Bashkir Bulgar Chagatai Chulym Chuvash Crimean Tatar Cuman Dolgan Fuyü Gïrgïs Gagauz Ili Turki Karachay-Balkar Karaim Karakalpak Karamanli Turkish Kazakh Khakas Khalaj Khazar Khorasani Turkic Kipchak Krymchak Kumyk Kipchak languages Kyrgyz Nogai Old Turkic Ottoman Turkish Pecheneg Qashqai Sakha/Yakut Salar Shor Siberian Tatar Tatar Tofa Turkish Turkmen Tuvan Urum Uyghur Uzbek Western Yugur


Afshar Ahiska Altays Azerbaijanis Balkars Bashkirs Bulgars Chulyms Chuvash Crimean Tatars Cumans Dolgans Dughlats Gagauz Iraqi Turkmens Karachays Karaites Karakalpaks Karluks Kazakhs Khakas Khalajs Khazars Khorasani Turks Kimek Kipchaks Krymchaks Kumandins Kumyks Kyrgyz Nogais Oghuz Turks Qarapapaqs Qashqai Salar Shatuo Shors Sybyrs Syrian Turkmen Tatars Telengits Teleuts Tofalar Turgesh Turkish people

in Bulgaria Turkish Cypriots in Kosovo in Egypt in the Republic of Macedonia in Romania in Western Thrace

Turkmens Tuvans Uyghurs Uzbeks Western Yugurs Yakuts Yueban


Grey Wolves Kemalism Burkhanism Pan-Turkism Turanism


Turkestan History Timeline of the Göktürks

Timeline 500–1300 migration

Nomadic empire Tian Shan / Altai Mountains Otuken


Sovereign states

Azerbaijan Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus1 Turkey Turkmenistan Uzbekistan

Autonomous areas

Altai Republic Bashkortostan Chuvashia Gagauzia Kabardino-Balkaria Karachay-Cherkessia Karakalpakstan Khakassia Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic Sakha Republic Tatarstan Tuva Xinjiang


Old Turkic alphabet Proto-Turkic language Turkology


Turkic mythology Tengrism Shamanism Islam Alevism Batiniyya Bayramiye Bektashi Order Christianity Hurufism Kadiri Khalwati order Malamatiyya Qalandariyya Qizilbash Rifa'i* Safaviyya Zahediyeh Vattisen Yaly

Traditional sports

Kyz kuu Jereed Kokpar Dzhigit Chovgan


Turkic Council International Organization of Turkic Culture
International Organization of Turkic Culture
(TÜRKSOY) Organization of the Eurasian Law Enforcement Agencies with Military Status (TAKM) World Turks Qurultai

1 State with limited internat